The New York Times Puts Its Beret over Its Heart for Jacques
[F]or Derrida, things can never be what they say. Any attmept to explain or reason or demonstrate or communicate already contains the seeds of its undoing; any statement must conjure up its opposite. Pay close attention and it becomes clear how much energy is being expended on pretending to make clear what really cannot be. Look even more closely and there is always a small point in text--paradox, an unexplained word, a knotty phrase &mdash that when properly probed can undermine the pretense, pull aside the curtain of ideology and show what indeterminacy and uncertainty lie beneath the surface.
That's why I loved him. Damn it! I promised myself I wouldn't cry.
2 Comments:
You're the only blogger I've found that has taken on Derrida's death...you de-constructionists are all the same, or are you?
Don't worry, he's made many a college student cry.
No, you're right. We're all the same. If you doubt it, just take a look at our dissertation topics.
Besides, you didn't think we all dressed, brooded, and coifed our facial hair alike by coincidence, did you?
Post a Comment
<< Home