Of Course, None of This Would've Happened if He'd Simply Tasered the Baby, Instead
A man who zapped his wife's grandmother with a Taser tells a Washington newspaper that if he had it to do over again he wouldn't have used it.
Aaron de Bruyn was arrested after a dispute earlier this week over how to discipline his seven-month-old son.
He gave the baby a swat on his diapered rear-end to stop him from grabbing electrical wires. The wife's grandmother, who was visiting, called that child abuse and said she'd have the child taken away.
That's when de Bruyn told her to leave the house. When she refused, he got out the Taser and gave her a 60-second countdown and then used the stun gun on her right shoulder.
In doing so, he was able to teach grandma the lesson he was trying to teach his son: Don't fuck with electricity.
7 Comments:
1) Only a moron would spank a diapered baby to teach it a lesson. Here's a clue, if the kid is still wearing a diaper, the lesson is lost.
2) He failed to give granny enough time to leave the house. 60 seconds is not ample time for some people to move.
3) He's too dumb to be helping raise a child, perhaps we should neuter him. . .with the taser.
I think Renee should be banned from leaving comments on your blog. Obviously she missed the whole point, besides having a total lack of appreciation for a man who tasers his in-laws. Deeeammmn!
And silence the voice of reason on my blog? Perish the thought.
circa bellum. . . stop it, you're turning me on.
Okay, you two. Play nice.
If I have to come back in here again, . . .
Well, let's just say someone's getting spanked and someone's getting Tasered. And I think we all know how that plays out.
Damn guys, now you're turning me on. I think we need to have a three way to work out our differences.
Are you sure you're from Arkansas?
Post a Comment
<< Home